{"product_id":"b0g674q67f","title":"Emanuel Law Outlines for Criminal Procedure","description":"\u003cp\u003eABOUT THE BOOK—TOOLS TO SUCCEED\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe  Capsule Summary  provides a quick reference summary of the key concepts covered in the full Outline.   The  detailed course Outline with black letter principles  supplements your casebook reading throughout the semester and gives structure to your own outline.   The  Quiz Yourself  feature includes a series of short-answer questions and sample answers to help you test your knowledge of the chapter’s content.  Exam Tips  alert you to issues and commonly used fact patterns found on exams.   A  Casebook Correlation Chart  that correlates each section in the Outline with the pages covering that topic in the major casebooks.   In this new edition of  Emanuel Law Outlines® for Criminal Procedure , professors and students will benefit from new and expanded coverage, including:\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eRecent lower-court cases interpreting the 2018 decision in  Carpenter v. U.S ., under which government demands for a  suspect’s personal data  held by a  non-governmental third-party  (e.g., a cellphone company) must sometimes be supported by a  search warrant  and  probable cause .  Mitchell v. Wisconsin , holding that police  do not require a search warrant  before performing a  blood-alcohol test  of a driver who is  so drunk as to be unconscious. 42 U.S.C. §1983 , a statute that sometimes allows people whose Fourth Amendment or other constitutional rights have been  violated by a police officer  to bring a  civil suit for money damages  against the officer.  Samia v. U.S. , covering the situation in which D1 and D2 are  tried together  for the same crime, and the prosecution wants to present to the jury a  confession by D1  (who doesn’t take the stand) that also  implicates D2 . Samia makes it much easier for prosecutors to present D1’s confession with only  slight redactions  of the portions that implicate D2, without thereby violating D2’s  Confrontation Clause rights .   Claims of “ selective prosecution ,” including why it’s  virtually impossible  for a defendant to successfully assert such claims.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"ANT","offers":[{"title":"Ebook","offer_id":52820419969240,"sku":"YSL35407","price":39.87,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0835\/3356\/2072\/files\/61KQOg4ANZL._SY1500.jpg?v=1793097136","url":"https:\/\/www.bookmebay.com\/products\/b0g674q67f","provider":"BookMebay","version":"1.0","type":"link"}